श्रीसनातन

The schools of Vedānta

वेदान्त सम्प्रदाय

Also written: advaita · vishishtadvaita · dvaita · shankara ramanuja madhva · vedanta schools · achintya bhedabheda

Six ācāryas commented on the same three texts and reached six different conclusions. Each founded a living lineage; all six survive; none was suppressed. The disagreement is the tradition's intellectual history in concentrated form.

The six schools
SchoolĀcāryaBrahman and soulThe worldLiberation
AdvaitaŚaṅkara, 8th c.Identical. The apparent difference is superimpositionNot unreal, not independently real; name and form on Brahman (māyā)Recognition that the self was never separate
ViśiṣṭādvaitaRāmānuja, 11th c.Non-dual, but Brahman is qualified by souls and matter as body by soulFully real; the body of BrahmanEternal communion and service in Vaikuṇṭha
DvaitaMadhva, 13th c.Eternally distinct. Five differences are real and permanentFully real and dependent on ViṣṇuEternal enjoyment of God, in a graded order
DvaitādvaitaNimbārka, 13th c.Both different and non-different — as waves and seaReal, a transformation of Brahman's powerCommunion with Kṛṣṇa and Rādhā
ŚuddhādvaitaVallabha, 16th c.Non-dual without māyā; the soul is a spark of BrahmanReal, a genuine manifestation — no illusion involvedPuṣṭi — grace; the play of Kṛṣṇa entered into
Acintya-bhedābhedaCaitanya / Jīva Gosvāmī, 16th c.Inconceivably one and different at onceReal, the energy of KṛṣṇaPrema — pure love in eternal relationship

Advaita's central move

Śaṅkara's argument turns on adhyāsa — superimposition. We see a rope in dim light and take it for a snake; the snake was never there, and its removal is not the destruction of a snake but the ending of an error. Similarly the world of separate things is superimposed on Brahman. Note carefully: Śaṅkara does not say the world is nothing. It has vyāvahārika satya — empirical reality, fully valid at its own level — and is sublated only by the knowledge of Brahman, not by argument or by wishing.

Rāmānuja's objection

Rāmānuja replies that an undifferentiated Brahman cannot be known at all, that the Upaniṣads describe Brahman with qualities as often as without, and that a doctrine of illusion makes devotion meaningless — one cannot love what one is about to discover does not exist. His alternative keeps non-duality while making the world and souls genuinely real as the body of God.

Madhva's five differences

Madhva takes the opposite pole: difference is not an appearance but the very structure of reality. He names five eternal differences — between God and soul, God and matter, soul and matter, one soul and another, one material thing and another — and argues that the Upaniṣadic identity statements must be read in the light of the difference statements, not the reverse.


Continue reading

Last revised 2026-08-16. Corrections are welcome — see how this site is written.